Fargo Standard

Congresswoman Julie Fedorchak has recently highlighted two key issues in her latest social media posts: a major agricultural trade commitment from Taiwan and legislative efforts concerning U.S. energy infrastructure.

On September 17, 2025, Fedorchak commented on Taiwan's recent agreement to purchase $10 billion worth of American agricultural products over the next three years, specifically noting the benefit for North Dakota producers. She stated, "Taiwan's commitment to purchase $10B worth of American ag products over the next 3 years is welcome news for North Dakota soybean & corn growers. Great to be with Ambassador Yui & Minister of Agriculture Chen to celebrate this partnership. Thank you for supporting American ag!"

The following day, September 18, Fedorchak announced her participation in House debate regarding her proposed legislation. She posted, "Heading to the House Floor for debate on my bill, the Promoting Cross-Border Energy Infrastructure Act. Be sure to tune in! "

Later that same day, she addressed concerns about recent federal actions impacting energy projects: "The Biden admin canceled the Keystone XL pipeline on day one of office, costing thousands of jobs & more than $3 billion in GDP. We need a cross-border permitting process that is transparent, predictable, & durable—a process that can’t be undone with the stroke of a pen. Watch:"

The context for these statements includes ongoing debates about U.S.-Taiwan trade relations and their significance for American agriculture—especially in states like North Dakota where soybeans and corn are major exports. The Taiwanese market has historically been an important destination for U.S. agricultural goods.

In addition, energy infrastructure remains a contentious topic at the federal level. The Keystone XL pipeline project was canceled by executive action early in President Biden’s term—a move that drew criticism from some lawmakers and industry advocates who argue it resulted in significant job losses and economic impacts.

Fedorchak’s legislative proposal aims to address such concerns by advocating for a permitting process governing cross-border energy projects that would be less susceptible to abrupt policy reversals.